Concerns Rise Among Local Colorado Officials as Elections Security Program Faces Cuts

Published:

Federal Funding Cuts Impact Election Security in Fremont County, Colorado

Fremont County, Colorado, is facing a significant challenge in election security following the abrupt termination of federal funding for the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC). This morning, Justin Grantham, the Fremont County Clerk and Recorder, received an alarming email announcing that the Department of Homeland Security had cut funding for the center, effectively halting its operations. Grantham, who joined EI-ISAC shortly after taking office in 2019, expressed deep concern over the implications of this decision for rural counties across the nation.

The Role of EI-ISAC

The EI-ISAC was established as a voluntary partnership between the Center for Internet Security (CIS), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Election Infrastructure Subsector Government Coordinating Council. Its mission was to provide a collaborative platform for state, local, tribal, and territorial organizations involved in conducting elections. The center facilitated the sharing of critical information regarding cybersecurity threats, best practices, and resources necessary to safeguard election infrastructure.

Grantham recalled a specific incident in 2022 when Fremont County experienced a cyber-attack. Thanks to the rapid communication network established by EI-ISAC, the county was able to receive timely warnings and prevent further damage. "They literally cut off the head of the snake before it ended up disseminating to create more heads," Grantham noted, emphasizing the importance of EI-ISAC’s role in protecting election systems.

Impact on Rural Counties

The loss of EI-ISAC’s support is particularly concerning for rural counties, which often lack the resources and expertise to combat sophisticated cyber threats. Grantham highlighted that these smaller jurisdictions rely heavily on the network provided by EI-ISAC to stave off potential disasters, whether they be technical failures, cyberattacks, or even natural disasters. "It’s definitely the rural pieces of not just Colorado, but the entire nation that utilize people with the expertise to be able to help them," he stated.

Concerns from Larger Counties

The ramifications of EI-ISAC’s closure extend beyond rural areas. Steve Schleiker, the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder, shared his concerns regarding the potential vulnerabilities that could arise from the funding cuts. While he noted that the security of election machines would remain intact, online components such as voter registration databases and election night results reporting could become more susceptible to attacks. Schleiker emphasized the critical role EI-ISAC played in providing cybersecurity insights, stating, "They were the ones out there on the cybersecurity side, going into the deep web and pulling this stuff out."

Voices from Across the State

In Pueblo, County Clerk and Recorder Candance Rivera echoed the sentiments of her colleagues, expressing alarm over the funding cuts. In a statement, she described EI-ISAC as a "necessary and critical program" that safeguards the integrity and security of elections in the United States. Rivera warned that the cuts could lead to the elimination of essential training, threat monitoring services, and resources that election officials rely on. "The threat of sophisticated cyberattacks, foreign interference, and threats to election workers in U.S. elections only increases by the day," she cautioned.

State Officials Respond

The response from state officials has been swift. Colorado Secretary of State Jenna Griswold addressed the situation, highlighting the broader implications of federal funding cuts on election security programs. "Since January, the Trump administration has cut vital election security programs, and there is uncertainty about the future of funding for federal programs that safeguard elections," she stated. Griswold assured that her office is actively examining ways to fill potential gaps in security measures.

Despite the challenges posed by the funding cuts, Griswold reaffirmed Colorado’s commitment to maintaining high standards in election security and accessibility. "Our elections have multiple layers of security, and we are always anticipating new threats and taking action to prevent them," she said, emphasizing the state’s proactive approach to safeguarding the electoral process.

Conclusion

The termination of funding for EI-ISAC poses a serious threat to the integrity and security of elections in Fremont County and beyond. As local officials grapple with the implications of this decision, the need for robust cybersecurity measures has never been more critical. The collaborative efforts fostered by EI-ISAC have proven invaluable in protecting election infrastructure, and the loss of this resource could leave many jurisdictions vulnerable to emerging threats. As the situation unfolds, it is clear that the protection of election integrity must remain a bipartisan priority for the sake of democracy in the United States.

Related articles

Recent articles